League champion restrictions with high win %???

Well said. I've never had multiple accounts, been playing since 2001 on one account, learning and growing, I think multiple accounts is very dishonest. NO respect to those who choose to do so.

Must be they didn’t read this thread because there is another $140 mil league forming with managers of similar experience and success as the last one I posted about.

Perhaps this has something to do with multiple accounts, as stated previously, however I think that these guys are just chicken shite and/or looking for easy wins.

Someone should form a $140 mil, DH league called “For managers who aren’t afraid of facing real competition and won’t hide behind the “12 or less Rings” BS”!

Well, I started a league in response to this. It’s a public league and shouldn’t be hard to find.

If we can take our time in filling this league that’d be cool… the Name of the league sorta serves as a protest banner.

I think HAL helps new managers. you can game the system by being a "starter". i.e. win credits easier. the motive, starters get into playoffs with their new teams, they buy more credits they're hooked. I've always used the same account but the obvious is not an illusion.

How does HAL help new managers? Just curious about the evidence for this, or is it a hunch?

Something along the same lines but quite a bit different.

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/league/468950

They’re at it again: “12 Rings” or less this time

I think it's weak to do these types of leagues, SOFT! Like they say, you don't learn to become a better tennis player by always playing against weaker competition. Gimme a break ....

Sometimes a little success is all you need to propel you a bit. I won my first championship in one of those leagues. I'm not great but I have won 26 more. Not weak, just wanting to compete. Of course I was in a sub 500 league.

BTW, as a coach I believe you can learn from winning as well as losing.