- Posts: 2916
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:25 pm
Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:28 pm
Is it wrong to suggest (especially to beginners) that some franchise leagues would be a lot more fun and fair if they had lower salary caps?
A franchise like the Yankees is always going to have a big advantage because they have more good and great cards to choose from. However, at least if there is a reasonable salary cap, like 140-80 million, more franchises would be viable?
I know some of it is just personal preference, of course, but if we are being open and honest doesn't a franchise league with a 100 million dollar cap give more people the chance to pick their favorite franchise AND at least having a chance to stay competitive?
I just can't imagine any beginner having luck with a franchise league that has a 250 million dollar cap, and a lesser franchise. And if my assumption is true the list of franchises , and participants shrink dramatically.
A franchise like the Yankees is always going to have a big advantage because they have more good and great cards to choose from. However, at least if there is a reasonable salary cap, like 140-80 million, more franchises would be viable?
I know some of it is just personal preference, of course, but if we are being open and honest doesn't a franchise league with a 100 million dollar cap give more people the chance to pick their favorite franchise AND at least having a chance to stay competitive?
I just can't imagine any beginner having luck with a franchise league that has a 250 million dollar cap, and a lesser franchise. And if my assumption is true the list of franchises , and participants shrink dramatically.