Should Pre-1893 players be added?

Discussion for new cards to add; moderated by Rosie2167

Moderator: BC15NY

Should pre 1893 players be added to ATG?

YES
18
45%
NO
22
55%
 
Total votes : 40

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

STEVE F

  • Posts: 4225
  • Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:08 pm

Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 1:49 pm

Just a straw poll to gauge interest. This poll is not "officially" sanctioned by the ATG committee.
Offline

Salty

  • Posts: 1662
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostThu Nov 09, 2017 2:09 pm

STEVE F wrote:Just a straw poll to gauge interest. This poll is not "officially" sanctioned by the ATG committee.


Thank you Steve.

I'm glad that my agreement that this poll isn't a bad idea wasn't taken as a tacit contract
that Id be leading this discussion by too many people. :D
Offline

Chris Franco

  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:18 pm
  • Location: Florence South Carolina

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostThu Feb 01, 2018 5:00 pm

AL before 1903 or NL before 1901 should never be added to ATG in my opinion.
Foul balls were not counted as strikes.
Talk about apples and oranges!!!
Offline

Radagast Brown

  • Posts: 2916
  • Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:25 pm

Re: Should Pre-1893 players be added?

PostTue Feb 06, 2018 12:40 am

Only when Kelly Leak and Willie Mays Hays get their cards.... What a joke...

Return to --- ATG Card Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests