Page2 AL Only Keeper Season 13 Drafting

I could go either way just fine. It might add an interesting wrinkle though, as the players would have an extra bit of risk / uncertainty involved. All in all, Id be up for it. Do we need to start a voting list or allow for more time for debate?

Like I said before, I'm OK with the prospect draft. I would suggest that we have a rule that prospects that sign with NL teams can only be held on the prospect list for up to 2 years after they have a strat card (we are using unleashed). So if a prospect was with an NL team and got a strat card for 2014, you could keep him on your prospect list for 2014 and 2015, but then you would have to either promote him as an AL player in 2016, or drop him from your prospect list in 2016. The purpose of this rule would be to prevent teams from "hiding" NL players on their prospect list for an extended period of time. You could still benefit from trades of prospects, say from an NL team to an AL team. But once a player has a strat card - NL or AL - this rule would take effect.

Hi,

If a prospect gets a card you have to place him on your roster. So if he gets an NL card you would lose his rights because he has an NL card.

Page2

Hi,

Lets start some voting.

1. Page2 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Hi,

Lets start some voting.

1. Page2 Yes
2. joshflanagan. Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Hi,

Lets start some voting.

1. Page2 Yes
2. joshflanagan. Yes
3. keyzick Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Hi,

Lets start some voting.

1. Page2 Yes
2. joshflanagan. Yes
3. keyzick Yes
4. Spider No
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Hi,

If a prospect gets a card you have to place him on your roster. So if he gets an NL card you would lose his rights because he has an NL card.

Page2

Sounds good.

1. Page2 Yes
2. joshflanagan. Yes
3. keyzick Yes
4. Spider No
5. GBrookes Yes
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

. Page2 Yes
2. joshflanagan. Yes
3. keyzick Yes
4. Spider No
5. GBrookes Yes
6.Terry101- Yes
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.